The same release restated a quarter this record had already published, and this is what the restatement did. Statistics Canada raised real GDP for January-March 2026 by $2,924 million, from $2,500,680 million to $2,503,604 million in chained 2017 dollars -- a rise of 0.12 per cent -- and raised the same quarter at current prices by $6,904 million, from $3,321,588 million to $3,328,492 million, a rise of 0.21 per cent. Nothing else in the table moved: 522 shared observations were compared and 520 came back identical. Four published readings changed as a result, none of them by an amount a reader would have guessed from the size of the restatement. First, real GDP for January-March 2026 measured against the same quarter a year earlier changed sign, from -0.05 per cent to +0.06 per cent: on the evidence published in May the economy was very slightly smaller than a year before, and on the evidence published in August it was very slightly larger. Second, the four-quarter change in real GDP per person ending in that quarter -- the reading this record published in July -- moved from +0.19 to +0.31 percentage points, before the new quarter was counted at all. Third, on the defence-spending question, the four quarters of nominal GDP spanning fiscal 2025-26 now average $3,271,267 million instead of $3,269,541 million, so the same $62,713 million of defence spending falls $2,712 million short of two per cent of GDP rather than $2,678 million; the recomputed ratio reads 1.92 per cent either way, so what that comparison concludes is unchanged. Fourth, on the fiscal question, Public Accounts net debt measured against GDP moved from 44.9 to 44.8 per cent -- the debt figure did not move, the denominator did. Countability's forecast scorecard also moved: measured against the restated quarter, the Bank of Canada's July 2026 projection for that quarter is about three and a half times further from the mark than it was against the quarter as first published, while its January and April 2026 projections are closer.
More: Can Canada raise living standards, not just its population? →